Sunday, February 22, 2015

50 Shades of Grey




It’s important to label the genre that ’50 Shades of Grey’ is:  Soft-core porn targeted for the female market edited down to achieve an ‘R’ rating.  In principle, I have nothing against this.  In fact, in higher principle, I highly encourage it, but this is so badly written, even for a full fledged pornographic film.  In fairness, I thought the film was better than the book, but I found the book to be low even by Harlequin Romance standards.  The sheer level of cheesiness and eye-rolling that permeates throughout this movie subtracts from any erotica it was trying to achieve. It doesn’t succeed as a thriller, a love story, or even as an introduction to bondage.  This film fails at all levels. Even the groups of women who went to see this for a ‘ladies night out’, could be heard muttering “That was horrible” as they left the theatre.  This is one of the worst movies I have seen in a long time.

I don’t want to spend an entire review berating a film, but I am having a hard time finding some redeeming value.  At its’ core, the leads were completely miscast.  Dakota Johnson (daughter of Don Johnson and Melanie Griffith), plays the virginal Anastasia Steele (yes that is the character’s name)who is led down the path of S&M and bondage by the mysterious young self-made billionaire (they aren’t all as nerdy as Mark Zuckerberg), Christian Grey (played by Irish model Jamie Dornan).  The chemistry and acting were as wooden as you would expect from a Calvin Klein model and a new actress.  Jamie Dornan was putting on his best American accent, but his Irish brogue slipped through often. 

The entire time I was watching this, I felt this film was trying to replicate the classic ‘9 1/2 Weeks’ starring Mickey Rourke and Kim Bassinger.  ‘9 1/2 Weeks’ was truly a film that pushed sexual boundaries and challenged sexual mores while being beautifully acted and well written. If only ’50 Shades of Grey’ was even a shadow of that (there is a pun there with ‘shadow’ and ’50 Shades’, but it escapes me at the moment).  It demonstrates that this genre can be done and be done effectively and artistically in the right hands.  ’50 Shades’ achieved none of that.

I know there was supposed to be a storyline, but it was lost on me as one ‘shocking’ scene leads to another.  I could tell when dialogue or scenes were meant to be shocking and provocative, but I found the execution rather dull.  Much like ‘9 1/2 Weeks’, the story follows the protagonist as she descends into a darkly sexual world until she realizes the harm that it is causing her.  I found Anastasia’s realization of her peril to come almost out of nowhere and her dismay at what she was participating in to be rather contrived.  There was no true exploration of the characters or what motivated them.

I realize the popularity of this book and the global phenomenon that it has become.  I’ll be the first to say, having tried to read the book,  that I don’t get it, so I am probably not the best qualified to critique this movie.  That being said, I am an avid movie fan and there are infinitely better ways to spend your movie dollar.  If you are just looking for porn, then try the internet. If you are looking for a great movie, then most of the Oscar movies are still out there.  I recommend any one of them.  Or better yet, stay home and catch up on something else you’ve been meaning to do.

I give this movie 1/2* 

(I think the lowest I’ve ever given, but my next review is ‘Jupiter Ascending’, so just wait)



Whiplash


In my quest to see all the Oscar films before the actual event, I half heartedly went to see ‘Whiplash’ with no real expectations.  LOVED THIS MOVIE!  I found it to be a mesmerizing and unflinchingly intense film that leaves no doubt in my mind that JK Simmons will walk away with the Oscar nod for Best Supporting Actor.  In fact, JK was so central to the film that I wondered if he shouldn’t have been considered the lead actor.  His performance was that powerful and central.  While I found many elements over-the-top and heavy handed, there is no denying the emotional intensity and hypnotic effect of this film.

Anyone who has ever gone to the movies, channel surfed on TV, or watched a Farmer’s Insurance commercial will probably recognize JK Simmons even if they don’t know his name.  He is one of those consistent character actors who, while respected, never got his due.  This film showcases his talent and illustrates a depth that one does not expect from a character actor. The role perfectly fits his penchant for playing cantankerous foils, yet he takes this to a whole different level.  His intensity and passion is palpable.

The story centers around an aspiring drummer named Andrew, who enrolls in a highly competitive music conservatory where he dreams of being mentored by Prof Fletcher (JK Simmons), a man who will stop at nothing to push students to their limits and beyond.  What starts out as a dream come true when Andrew is noticed by Fletcher quickly becomes a nightmare as Fletcher suddenly and explosively reveals how intense and borderline psychopathic a teacher he is in the classroom. Berating to the point of tears, Fletcher does not let up until he is able to break a student down.  He runs his classroom with military precision as everyone averts their eyes from his in fear of being singled out and torn down.  Students are granted favored status or cast out on a whim and Fletcher will let nothing go until he feels it has achieved perfection.

Andrew is driven and talented and determined to prove himself worthy.  He drives himself to the point of sacrificing all other aspects of his life (including his health) to achieve his dream.  While Fletcher’s tirades and megalomania break him down, Andrew pushes that much harder despite the cost to him personally.  The camera shots of Fletcher next to Andrew’s face create a tension that are so heightened by the minimalism of the scenes that no amount of CGI or special effects could ever compete.  It’s fascinating to watch Andrew’s deterioration even as he flourishes as a musician.

Fletcher is villainous to the point of satire, but his messages ring true in nurturing excellence.  As he states “The two most dangerous words in the English language are ‘Good Job’!”, you can sense his devotion to drive and perseverance in the quest for achievement.  Settling for “good enough” is not something that Fletcher understands or is interested in.  Greatness at all costs.
As I stated earlier, the minimalism of this film is what is so enthralling.  This could be done on Broadway as a two man show.  The tension (and sometimes fear) is palpable throughout the film.  This shows you don’t need big budgets or giant productions to make films that make an impact.  I highly recommend this film and anxiously await JK Simmons accepting his Academy Award.


I give this film **** stars



Thursday, February 19, 2015

87th annual Oscars: Predictions


The 87th Oscars
Tad’s Predictions
      The time is here for my predictions of this year’s Oscar movies.  As always, I focus on my favorite categories of Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor, Best Supporting Actress, and Best Director.
Best Picture:

  • The Grand Budapest Hotel
  • Boyhood
  • American Sniper
  • The Imitation Game
  • Selma
  • Theory of Everything
  • Whiplash
  • Birdman

The battle this year will be between Birdman and Boyhood.  I thought Birdman had the lock on it, but Boyhood has been getting a lot of buzz lately.  
Tad’s Prediction:  Birdman

Best Actor
  • Steve Carrell
  • Bradley Cooper
  • Benedict Cumberbatch
  • Michael Keaton
  • Eddie Redmayne

This one will be between Michael Keaton for Birdman or Eddie Redmayne for Theory of Everything. I think after a long career, it is Keaton's time
Tad’s Prediction: Michael Keaton

Best Actress
  • Marion Cottilard
  • Felicity Jones
  • Julliane Moore
  • Rosemund Pike
  • Reese Witherspoon

This one was a challenge for me.  Reese Witherspoon and Rosemund Pike are both strong contenders, but Julianne Moore is getting the buzz for Still Alice
Tad’s Prediction: Julianne Moore

Best Supporting Actor
  • Robert Duvall
  • Ethan Hawke
  • Ed Norton
  • Mark Ruffalo
  • JK Simmons

No contest: JK Simmons for Whiplash
Tad’s Prediction: JK Simmons

Best Supporting Actress
  • Meryl Streep
  • Patricia Arquette
  • Kiera Knightly
  • Emma Stone
  • Laura Dern

You can never discount Meryl Streep in an Academy race, but Boyhood will be recognized somehow this night.   
Tad’s Prediction:  Patrica Arquette

Best Director
  • Alejandro G. Iñárritu
  • Richard Linklater
  • Bennett Miller
  • Wes Anderson
  • Morton Tyldum

This could go many ways, but Birdman was such a unique and talked about film, I think it is going to go that way
Tad’s Prediction: Alejandro G. Iñárritu