Sunday, June 5, 2016

Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping



         For those of you old enough to remember, ‘Spinal Tap’ was a cult hit in the 1980’s and was the first time I ever heard the term ‘mockumentary’.  That’s where a comedy is filmed in a documentary format, yet lampoons its’ subject matter.  ‘Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping’ is SNL alumni Adam Samberg’s modern take on the music scene today and a fine addition to the mockumentary genre.  He mirror’s ‘Spinal Tap’s’ format and wit, but in his own voice and with humor uniquely his.  I won’t say that this film will be a game changer the way ‘Spinal Tap’ was, but it was immensely enjoyable and cleverly insightful.  I went in with low expectations, yet thoroughly enjoyed myself.

The plot is something we have seen played out in real life many times.  When former boy band member, Conner4real’s (Adam Samberg) solo album tanks, his once high living life goes into a downward tailspin.  He is willing to do anything that it takes to regain his previous status except reunite with his former Twisty Boyz band.  Jorma Taccone and Akiva Schaffer play Owen and Lawerence, Conner4real’s left behind band mates.  In real life there is a similar dynamic where the three are part of a SNL writing trio that brought us so many great digital shorts.  Where Adam Samberg is becoming a household name, these two are still relatively unknown.  It was fun to see the superimposition. 

The film is littered with SNL and musician cameos and characters.  Veteran utility player Tim Robbins plays their manager Harry.  He lives a good life, but still reminisces about his failed band, Tony!, Toné!, Toni! Tonee?.  In retrospect, he muses, the question mark after the last ‘Tonee’ was a mistake.  Sarah Silverman plays Conner’s publicist Paula, who explains that Conner4real is everywhere like oxygen, gravity, and clinical depression. The list goes on of former SNL alumni cameos, each contributing their clever takes on how they are part of Coneer4real’s posse. The interviews with real life musicians on how Conner4real influenced their music were hilarious as much for the seriousness in how they said it as for the inanity of what they said.  Much like Spinal Tap, even while we are laughing, we are also sympathizing with Conner4real as Adam does a good job instilling heart into Conner4real’s collapse from the spotlight.  

Similar to ‘Spinal Tap’, the film is a series of sketches pasted together to tell the story.  Some worked better than others, but the overall effort was a thoroughly enjoyable one.  One sees many fallen or soon to fall stars in Conner4real, but Adam seemed to be channeling Justin Beiber more than anyone else (maybe that’s just my bias).  It took me several scenes to recognize Justin Timberlake as Conner4real’s personal chef.  Ironic that Justin Timberlake seems to be one of the few former boy band alumni to emerge with a career intact. His part wasn’t that humorous, but the realization that it was him made it all the more enjoyable.

There are too many scenes to comment on. I could go on and on about Conner4real’s up coming rival Hunter (played by a hilarious Chris Redd) or describe the penis signing scene, which is one of the funniest moments in the film, but there is only so much space. Suffice it to say that this is a worthy successor to the ‘Spinal Tap’ tradition as well as a cautionary tale of fame altering what is important.  It is silly and extreme at times, but never loses its’ heart.  If you like Adam Samberg and his Digital Shorts on SNL, then you will love this film.  You don’t have to rush to the theater to see it, but definitely put it in your movie queue when it is released on DVD.  Great job to Adam Samberg, Judd Apatow, and team.

  I give this film *** stars



Monday, May 30, 2016

X-Men: Apocalypse


      ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ is here and it was not worth the wait.  The previous two movies in the ‘X-Men: First Class’ trilogy built so much positive momentum I had high hopes that the mojo would carry over into this film. This film, like in many comic book stories, fell victim in trying to outdo itself in spectacle.  The result was excessive style over substance and a whimpering last chapter to this story arc.  I’m not going to say this film was bad, just unfulfilling. When will directors and producers learn that just because you stuff more super heroes and special effects into a 2 hour period doesn’t mean you will make it better?  The success of ‘Captain America: Civil War’ is that it did not fall into this trap.  No matter how much ‘Civil War’ added, story and character came first.  We are introduced to so many new characters in ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’, yet we did not get to know any of them. We were re-introduced to previous characters from the original trilogy, but none of the chemistry was developed. Lots of special effects designed to make us  say ‘coooollll’ with mediocre at best CGI and a story line designed to glue together these endless fight scenes.

I think the most disappointing part of the film was the how they turned one of the X-Men’s greatest foes into a generic omnipotent villain who wants to destroy the world (still not exactly sure why). In fairness, Apocalypse (played by the normally phenomenal Oscar Issac) was always going to be a difficult character to bring to the screen.  He was a larger than life character in the pages of the comic book and it would be a challenge for any director to bring such omnipotence to the big screen.  Apocalypse, or En Sabah Nur, is a 5,000 year old Egyptian, believed to be the first mutant.  His ability to absorb other mutants powers over the millennia have transformed him into a god like creature.  When he is awoken from his millennia long slumber, his first assessment is that the world is run by the weak and must be ‘cleansed’.  In order to do so, he recruits what he considers four of the most powerful mutants on earth and he super charges their powers to be his henchmen.  The lineup consists of Magneto, a young Storm (Alexandra Shipp), Psylocke (Olivia Munn), and Angel (Ben Hardy).  This is where they lose a comic fan like me (and many others).  Magneto I can possibly see, even a case can be made for Storm, but Psylocke and Angel? Not exactly recruiting from the upper echelon.  This omnipotent being is recruiting beings he would probably consider in need of cleansing.

The main purpose of this film is to round out the trilogy and introduce the original movie X-Men as their younger selves so they can continue the franchise.  It felt like Jennifer Lawrence was just in it because they had her under contract.  She looked like she was just going through the motions and, in fact, rarely appeared in her supposed natural blue form (when you are a huge star, you don’t have to go through the hours of grueling make-up).  The highlight of the film for me was Micheal Fassbender’s Magneto.  Of course I’m biased as he is one of my favorite actors, but he delivered some of the most profound and poignant moments in the film.  Then of course there is Xavier (James McAvoy) where they were just looking for a story angle to transform him into the bald version all fans love.  Overall, I felt he was vastly underutilized. 

Like the third installment of most trilogies there is reflection on the previous in the form  of clip flashbacks. Combine that with some gratuitous cameos by other X-Men favorites and it was worth the price of admission, but not necessarily gratifying. Director Brian Singer tries to insert some self deprecating humor in one scene where a group of students see ‘The Revenge of the Jedi’ and note that the third movie in a trilogy is always the worse, but it comes off less funny and more irritatingly factual to a person who just plunked down $10 for a ticket would like to hear (not even counting popcorn and drink).  The new kid versions of the team are uninspiringly cast and never truly developed.  Spoiler Alert: The introduction of Jean Grey’s Phoenix powers come far too early in her career and should not have been introduced  this time around.

I can’t say I didn’t enjoy this film.  There were many things that kept me entertained. It’s just that the previous two films, plus the recent exceptional experiences of both Captain America and Deadpool,  set the bar so high that I can’t give this film a fair shot.  We have gotten to a point where we yawn at omnipotent villains because it always follows the same storyline: ‘no one can match the villain until all seems lost then someone manages to use a plot twist to defeat him’.  I’ve seen it and know when it will happen.  Predictability and formula is death in an action film. Still, go see this film just to round out the trilogy, but leave hoping that the next series of films in the franchise will learn something from Marvel Studios about how to make a super hero film.

I give this film ** stars




Sunday, May 8, 2016

Captain America: Civil War


       The much anticipated ‘Captain America: Civil War’ has arrived and I am happy to jump on the bandwagon of everyone praising this movie.  A culmination of the 13 Marvel movies that have preceded it, yet setting a new bar and standing out on its’ own.  Marvel shows that it is not done exploring what is possible in “Super-hero” movies and delivering a true cinematic experience. As I watched this, it occurred to me where DC is failing to find its’ niche.  It seems obvious, but Marvel captures the most important and obvious aspect of any storytelling; that characters come first.  Marvel delivers us smart dialogue and characters in which we all become engaged and invested, despite or because of their all too human flaws.  ‘Captain America: Civil War’, despite being packed to the point of overflowing with superheroes, never forgets that the characters and their development comes first.  Despite all the heroes, old and new, in this film, not one is used gratuitously and each has their part that expands the story.  

The plot is basic, yet complexly layered at the same time.  When a UN terrorist attack, seemingly perpetrated by Cap’s friend Bucky: The Winter Soldier, kills scores of people, including King T’Chaka of the fictitious nation of Wakanda, it’s the straw that broke the camel’s proverbial back and the world governments demand accountability for all the destruction that seems to follow the Avengers.   The Secretary of State (William Hurt, reprising the role of Thaddeus Ross) offers a compromise:  The Sokovia Accords. This would move the Avengers from a private organization to having oversight and accountability from a U.N. panel.  Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr at his best), racked with guilt over his role in the devastation created by Ultron embraces accountability, whereas Steve Rogers (Chris Evans comfortably owning the role of Captain America), an individualist, and  distrustful of government bodies and their unpredictable agendas, chooses the side of freedom from oversight. Thus the philosophical lines are drawn with each viewpoint being correct and the heroes take sides according to their beliefs.  

Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely return as Captain America’s writers and their impressive ability is to create a conflict where both sides are justified.  Even if we choose a side, we fully understand and empathize with the other viewpoint.  What is further impressive is that a film that is overflowing with characters are all deftly handled and flow seamlessly into an overall narrative.  Even with all these characters, we are introduced to two new ones who will be part of the Phase 3 Marvel plan.  Chadwick Boseman makes an impressive debut as the royal Black Panther.  Regal and tortured by the death of his father, his performance makes us long for his solo movie to come quickly.  In addition, Tom Holland is introduced as the MCU’s new rebooted Spider-man.  His performance has almost been universally heralded as getting the character right.  Even these blatant seed plantings of future franchises don’t feel forced and they belong in the film as much as all the other characters.  

The choice of villain in this film is what impressed me most of all.  The ‘rapidly becoming my favorite actor’, Daniel Brühl introduces us to a smaller than life villain named Zemo.  He has little screen time and much of it we are trying to figure out what he is doing and what his motivations are.  Instead of going over the top with the movie villain, like many Super-hero movies, Zemo is low key and mysterious.  We know his actions are leading to something, but without knowing his motivations, we are left in confusion.  It isn’t until the third act that the full purpose of his actions are realized and we understand how truly devastating this reserved and somewhat sympathetic villain is.  Daniel Brühl delivers exactly what he is supposed to.

As I started with this review, ‘Captain America: Civil War’ shines because of its’ character development.  From the intense visceral conflict between Tony Stark and Captain America to the more light-hearted moments between The Vision and Scarlet Witch and even further to the comedic interactions of Ant-man and Spider-man, all seem to belong in this movie and we are invested in these characters and care what becomes of them because of it.   This film is a symphony of character interplay that transcends the super-hero genre to become a truly great movie.  I give a metaphorical standing ovation.  The Russo brothers, who directed this, have proven to be great directors capable of taking the most successful movie genre in history to an even higher level of depth and respect.  The Marvel machine is not even close to running out of steam.

Phase 3 of the Marvel universe is packed full of new heroes and personally, I cannot wait to see what Marvel has to offer. They have proven that they won’t just recycle storylines, rather attempt to just give us new and exciting journeys into these characters that I have known since my childhood.  I don’t think it’s a case of DC vs Marvel as I feel there is room for both, but Marvel is definitely setting the pace.  DC needs to find their own style, but they could also take some notes on how to make a movie that is more than just a super power showcase. Hats off to everyone involved at Marvel for giving us this cinematic work.

I give this film ***** stars 





Sunday, April 10, 2016

Midnight Special


       ‘Midnight Special’ is one of these films that are flying under the radar during the off movie season and under the shadow of some of the bigger budget movies like ‘Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice”.  Truthfully, the only reason it came on my radar, because it has been generating some good critical buzz and I am a great admirer of Director Jeff Nichols.  I’m having a hard time pigeon-holing  this film into a particular genre. At its’ core it is a ‘father and son on the run’ film, but that is not enough to describe it.  It has elements of science fiction, horror, even to a lesser extent a family movie despite its’ ‘R’ rating. I could very well have seen the studios try to make this blockbuster in scope, but despite the high tension and deep bass music this is a quiet film.  The movie derives its’ purpose from the simplicity of it even though the context is immense.

The story starts with father and son Roy and Alton (Michael Shannon and Jaeden Leiberher respectively) escaping a Texas cult along with Roy’s State trooper childhood friend, Lucas.  We don’t know exactly why they are running at first, but we know that Alton is different.  After the Government raids the compound and starts interviewing the cult members about Alton, we realize how truly different Alton truly is.  Special Agent Sevier (‘Star Wars’ Adam Driver) leads the interview and is trying to find the answer as to why the compound leader Calvin Meyer’s (Sam Shepard) sermons contain coded government messages of the highest security.  Calvin’s answer is that Alton speaks to him in tongues and they’ve had to keep him locked away for everyone’s safety. That is locked away until Friday March 05, which is the cult’s Doomsday prophecy.

The majority of this movie is Roy, Lucas, and Alton on the run through the highways and motels of Texas.  We know that Alton is different, but he seems a normal kid in every respect even if he does seem wise beyond his years.  Normal that is, until vast amounts of light and energy manifest itself inside him.  Each episode leaves him weaker.  No matter what terror the Roy feels as his son seems to transform, his love and purpose is steadfast.  Alton knows he has to be somewhere precise on March 05 and Roy will let nothing stop him from getting there.  Even if he doesn’t know exactly where that is.

The crux of the movie revolves around how the adults adapt to know that something beyond human comprehension is manifesting itself in this boy.  Roy follows his purpose with the devotion of a cult follower that he is and no one does intensity better than Michael Shannon.  Lucas is more loyal to his childhood friend Roy than he is to the calling, but as he sees the powers that Alton begins to manifest, he begins to realize the necessity of the journey.  

The film is small and relatively quiet, which I often enjoy, but too much so for the scope of what this film was trying to capture.  It’s like ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’ cloaked in a father and son on the run movie.  Jeff Nichols does an excellent job at creating a world of wonderment and fear, but overall there is a feeling that the payoff at the end was unsatisfying.  Where ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’ left us breathless, this one left us with unresolved questions.  Not that I need everything tied up in a neat bow, but one needs to feel satisfied at the end and be glad that they went on this journey.  I was not.  I still respect the film and the film making skill of Jeff Nichols, but this film is one only a film enthusiast would appreciate.

I recommend this film, but only give it ** 1/2 stars



Sunday, March 27, 2016

Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice


     There are so many things that were done right in ‘Batman v Superman’ that it makes no sense to me that I didn’t like the end product.  The characters were treated with respect and authenticity to the source material.  The casting of Ben Affleck and Gil Gadot turned out to be perfect choices for Batman and Wonder Woman respectively (we can debate Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor later). Storylines and even actual dialogue were adapted faithfully from Frank Miller and other well know DC storylines.  The battle itself was everything one could hope for and, once again, loyal to the epic comic book source material of ‘The Dark Knight Returns’.  So how could a movie with all of this going right be a film that didn’t deliver?  I’m sure there will be countless meetings in the Warner Bros studios among execs to determine exactly why this didn’t click the way Marvel movies do, but they will have consolation, because despite being almost universally panned by the critics and audiences, despite a dismal score of 31% on Rotten Tomatoes, ‘Batman v Superman’ is set to break Box Office records for a pre-May opening.  They are estimating a $171 million take over the Easter weekend.

Sure there wasn’t much competition this weekend (I’m not going to count ‘My Big Fat Greek wedding 2’)  and there was a 36 month advance marketing blitzkrieg that never lost its’ steam, but this was something comic book fans have been craving for decades.  And despite what critics want to believe, the public is a long way away from the super hero fatigue that they all predict will happen. So, what didn’t I like about it?  What does Marvel do so well that DC hasn’t been able to capture?  The answer: Marvel is able to make their intellectual property accessible to the general masses.  Marvel is able to take something non-comic book lovers originally thought of as silly and immature, i.e., super heroes, and give it a gravitas and relateability that has allowed it to cross over to mainstream audiences.  They give us stories with depth, but never lose sight of what made comic books magical to us as kids:  they are fun.  Director Zack Snyder lost sight of that fact and while he infuses these mythical characters with a seriousness, he takes it too far.  Snyder’s vision is dark and gloomy and lacks any of the wonder and joy associated with superheroes; especially franchises like Superman.  This movie is dark almost to the point of gothic.  

Another complaint I had was in defense of non-initiated super hero movie goers.  Marvel is able to deftly have story and plot lines that ones doesn’t need to be familiar with in order to enjoy.  This film tried to cram so much stuff in that I felt the layman would be left confused and with their head spinning.  One semi-dream/vision sequence in particular involved the ‘Flashpoint’ storyline.  This was complete with a post apocalyptic world where Batman battles para demons and The Flash coming back to warn Batman about Superman.  After the sequence, I wondered how anyone who wasn’t familiar with all those storylines would even know what’s going on.  That’s called alienating of your audience. Sure, it made all the fanboys giddy (and in fairness there are more and more of them), but you need that cross appeal to make the stories accessible to all.  I think this film lacked that.

The writing and editing were sloppy.  I can’t go into too much detail without giving away spoilers, but the only character whose motivations I understood were Batman’s.  There were so many holes in the story that were never explained and upon closer examination made no sense.  Characters that were actually intriguing were not developed in any way.  Lex Luthor (another controversial casting of Jesse Eisenberg) was an interesting modernization of the character to a malevolent Mark Zuckerberg style villain, but had motivations that were never really explained. We never understood why he was so desperate to destroy Superman.  Jeremy Irons reinvented the role of Alfred (even if much of his dialogue was taken straight from the ‘Dark Knight Returns’ comic series).  He was woefully underutilized.  Wonder Woman (controversially, but perfectly cast) is an un-named character in this movie. Even though we know she is the Princess Diana, it is never explained who she is or why she is involved or why she even cares to show up and help Superman and Batman.  Despite this, she was the most magnetic part of the final fight with Doomsday. Her performance makes me excited for the upcoming Wonder Woman movie, but that was it.  

I don’t mind new or alternate takes on franchises.  I even enjoy controversial re -imaginings, but one thing a super hero movie must have is excitement and wonder.  I felt despite all the great pieces and parts, ‘Batman vs Superman’ lacked that essential magical ingredient.  I’ll go so far as to say I respect the accomplishment that is this film.  Unfortunately, as much as I wanted to love this film, I just didn’t.  I feel I am being kinder to it in hindsight, but I must be honest with myself and felt something was missing when I was watching it.  There is no way I can talk myself out of that.  The odd thing is that I’m going to recommend seeing it.  It is a good introduction to the new DC extended universe that hopes to compete with Marvel.  My personal opinion is that, while I consider Zack Snyder an exceptional Director, his style and vision is not the one to go forward in this new universe. Warner Bros studios should regroup and try to find the magic elsewhere.  Despite my misgivings, this film has whetted my appetite for more.


  I give this film ** stars




Saturday, March 5, 2016

Deadpool


        With one of the biggest multi social media marketing campaigns that I can remember seeing for a mid-budget action movie, I approached ‘Deadpool’ with some trepidation.  I was never a fan of the comic book character and the R-rating gave studio execs heartburn for possibly alienating the traditional family market for super heroes.  Also, given Ryan Reynold’s previous disastrous outings in super hero movies (one playing Deadpool in a supporting role), I smelled box office bomb all the way to the theatre.  Fortunately and happily, I was mistaken.  Not only did ‘Deadpool' capture the essence of the comic book character, but it also gave me an appreciation for the character I never had before.  I won’t say it merited the $150 million dollar opening weekend it took in, but it was a fun time at the movies (assuming you aren’t easily offended).  Ryan Reynolds campaigned for this movie to be made for years and I’m glad it finally paid off.

The story of ‘Deadpool' centers around Wade Wilson, a wise cracking mercenary just trying to make his way through life as a low level enforcer for hire.  He finds love with the proverbial prostitute with a heart of gold, Vanessa (played by the stunning Morena Baccarin) and starts to build a life, until everything comes to a grinding halt when he discovers that he has terminal cancer. Grasping for straws at a cryptic offer from a mysterious man, he signs up for an experimental therapy for ex-soldiers.  He soon discovers the horrible mistake he has made when the lead scientist on the project named Ajax reveals the true purpose of the project; to awaken the dormant mutant genes of subjects through intensive chemical and torture therapy in order to create super powered soldiers… if they survive.  Wade does survive but at a horrible disfiguring cost.  Sounds like the basis for a great comedy right?  Believe it or not, it is a comedy and a funny one at that.

Quick uncomfortable fact about Deadpool is that he is actually plagiarized from a DC villain named Deathstroke, who just happened to be named Slade Wilson.  How was Marvel not sued over this?  Even though the character was a plagiarism (right down to double swords and uniform), Deadpool took a more comedic turn, even violating the comic book taboo of breaking the ‘Fourth Wall’.  That is where the character acknowledges the audience and recognizes that he is in a comic book story.  Much of the comedy is Deadpool addressing the audience with quips about his predicament.  While this seems like it could be distracting or even cheesy, it provides much of the charm of the film.  ‘Deadpool' is a spinoff from the X-men series, which tends to be more dramatic than comedic.  While the only well know X-man to appear in this film is Colossus, frequent mentions to the X-men world are made and the audience enjoys the juxtaposition of the comedic over the dramatic.  

The film itself is very light on plot.  In fact, there are really only two scenes in the whole film which are peppered with flashback sequences.  The movie relies on the over the top violence and wincing R-rated humor to drive the enjoyment.  I’m ashamed to say they succeeded.  I respect the chance studio execs took by breaking the successful template formula of previous super hero movies and giving a twice failed actor another chance at being a super hero.  Still, everyone must realize that the gold rush on super hero movies will eventually dry up and studios must find new and different formulas in order to keep the genre fresh.  This proves that R-rated humor and violence will find enough of an audience to make a movie financially viable.  

The comic book geek in me wonders if they will attempt to cross ‘Deadpool' over into the mainstream X-men movies.  I doubt it and I’m fine with that. I think Deadpool works better on his own as an alternative take on the dramatic super hero world.   It was interesting to see them have a different, albeit more source faithful, take on Colossus while interweaving the story with the main X-men universe.  Perhaps the now certain ‘Deadpool' franchise might be a great way to introduce more unique and unknown X-men to see if they have commercial appeal.  The most exciting thing about ‘Deadpool' is that it opens up all new possibilities in the genre now

Is this an R-rated movie for excessive graphic violence, crude humor, and sex?  Yes it is, but the way it is delivered reminds one more of a Road Runner cartoon than anything truly offensive.  I hope movies studios don’t obsess over creating blockbusters every time out.  There are smaller stories in the super hero world worth being told.  This is an example of how a studio took a chance and it paid off big.  There will be chances that don’t pay off as big, but I think the risk is worth it in order to provide us with a variety of story types.  Dead pool is a good time at the movies.


I give this film *** 1/2 stars




Saturday, February 27, 2016

Tad's 2016 Oscar Predictions

The 2016 Tad’s Movie Crawl 
Oscar Predictions 

This year I  must confess that I didn’t see all the nominated pictures.  A first for me.  In order to have a more educated guess I sought the assistance of my brother-in-law Mark.  We’ll see how close the two of us can get

Once again I emphasize, my predictions are who I think will win, not necessarily who I think should  win. So here goes:

BEST PICTURE
The Revenant All the mojo and buzz is behind this film this year

ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Leonardo DiCaprio, The Revenant: I think this is Leo’s year

ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
Brie Larson, RoomIt won’t be Jennifer Lawrence again.  This small film created enough of a buzz to be a winner in this category

ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Sylvester Stallone, Creed:  While I think Tom Hardy deserves it, so does Sly.  I think he will get it

ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Rachel MacAdams, Spotlight
Alicia Vikander, The Danish Girl:  I’ll admit it.  This one is a complete guess for me

DIRECTING
The RevenantL  It’s going to be a ‘two years in a row’ for Alejandro

There you go, my predictions once again.  We’ll see where they land